Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Computing women

Frequently men are known to compare the understanding of women to the most difficult problems they face. As a computer scientist, this implies that understanding women is an algorithm of exponential or even factorial time and space complexity with possibly non-deterministic results. Perhaps this is a reason why men are still blundering about finding incomplete solutions to ill-defined problems relating to the involvement of women in the computer field. Why is computing still a male dominated field? Clearly, it has some appeal to women. My wife and sisters are excellent examples of this. Yet women are still found under-represented at commencement. Are we as men discouraging them from continuing through the degree program? Are we making the field uninteresting to them through our teaching methods and/or hygiene practices? Is it possible that women are simply not interested in the field? In order to find the solution, we truly need a better conception of the problem. The truth is that we don't know what keeps women from becoming prominent and successful in our field, and until we achieve that vital problem formulation, we will never be able to make the changes that we clearly need to make. Has anyone ever thought to ask?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Interesting thoughts. I think you're asking the wrong question: "Are we as men discouraging them from continuing through the degree program?"

Computer science is a hard major for males and females alike. I'd submit (based solely on anecdotal evidence) that the number of men who drop out of CS as a proportion of the number of men who start out in CS is greater than or equal to the number of women who drop the program after having started as a proportion of women entering the program.

Having said that, I think the question you really want an answer to is: Are we doing something to discourage them from entering the degree program?